netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/14] Modify action API for implementing lockless actions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <vbffu2s14os.fsf@reg-r-vrt-018-180.mtr.labs.mlnx>
Date:   Wed, 16 May 2018 09:43:15 +0300
From:   Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To:     Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us, pablo@...filter.org,
        kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kliteyn@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Modify action API for implementing lockless actions


On Tue 15 May 2018 at 21:49, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> On 15/05/18 05:21 PM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue 15 May 2018 at 18:25, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>>> On 14/05/18 04:46 PM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon 14 May 2018 at 18:03, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 14/05/18 10:27 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello Jamal,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to run tdc, but keep getting following error even on clean
>>>> branch without my patches:
>>>
>>> Vlad, not sure if you saw my email:
>>> Apply Roman's patch and try again
>>>
>>> https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=152639369112020&w=2
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> jamal
>> 
>> With patch applied I get following error:
>> 
>> Test 7d50: Add skbmod action to set destination mac
>> exit: 255 0
>> dst MAC address <11:22:33:44:55:66>
>> RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
>> We have an error talking to the kernel
>> 
>
> You may actually have broken something with your patches in this case.

Results is for net-next without my patches.

>
> Lucas - does this test pass on latest net-next?
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> PS:- any reason for the big Cc? I have trimmed it down.

This Cc was generated by gen_maintainer.