netdev - [bpf-next PATCH 2/2] bpf: add sk_msg prog sk access tests to test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180517155409.21250.77305.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 08:54:10 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bpf-next PATCH 2/2] bpf: add sk_msg prog sk access tests to
 test_verifier

Add tests for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG to test_verifier for read access
to new sk fields.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
---
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h              |    8 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c |  115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index d94d333..97446bb 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2176,6 +2176,14 @@ enum sk_action {
 struct sk_msg_md {
 	void *data;
 	void *data_end;
+
+	__u32 family;
+	__u32 remote_ip4;	/* Stored in network byte order */
+	__u32 local_ip4;	/* Stored in network byte order */
+	__u32 remote_ip6[4];	/* Stored in network byte order */
+	__u32 local_ip6[4];	/* Stored in network byte order */
+	__u32 remote_port;	/* Stored in network byte order */
+	__u32 local_port;	/* stored in host byte order */
 };
 
 #define BPF_TAG_SIZE	8
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index a877af0..1ac7630 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1686,6 +1686,121 @@ static void bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw(struct bpf_test *self)
 		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
 	},
 	{
+		"valid access family in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"valid access remote_port in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"valid access local_port in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3])),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+	},
+	{
+		"valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3])),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+	},
+	{
+		"invalid 64B read of family in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"invalid read past end of SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port) + 4),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
+		"invalid read offset in SK_MSG",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+	},
+	{
 		"direct packet read for SK_MSG",
 		.insns = {
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,