| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180517211703.14426.80415.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 14:17:03 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [bpf-next PATCH v2 2/2] bpf: add sk_msg prog sk access tests to
test_verifier
Add tests for BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG to test_verifier for read access
to new sk fields.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 8 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 123 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index d94d333..97446bb 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2176,6 +2176,14 @@ enum sk_action {
struct sk_msg_md {
void *data;
void *data_end;
+
+ __u32 family;
+ __u32 remote_ip4; /* Stored in network byte order */
+ __u32 local_ip4; /* Stored in network byte order */
+ __u32 remote_ip6[4]; /* Stored in network byte order */
+ __u32 local_ip6[4]; /* Stored in network byte order */
+ __u32 remote_port; /* Stored in network byte order */
+ __u32 local_port; /* stored in host byte order */
};
#define BPF_TAG_SIZE 8
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index a877af0..6ec4d9d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1686,6 +1686,121 @@ static void bpf_fill_rand_ld_dw(struct bpf_test *self)
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
},
{
+ "valid access family in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "valid access remote_ip4 in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip4)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "valid access local_ip4 in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip4)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "valid access remote_port in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_port)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "valid access local_port in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "valid access remote_ip6 in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[0])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[1])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[2])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, remote_ip6[3])),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "valid access local_ip6 in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[0])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[1])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[2])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_ip6[3])),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB,
+ },
+ {
+ "invalid 64B read of family in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "invalid read past end of SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, local_port) + 4),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "R0 !read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
+ "invalid read offset in SK_MSG",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct sk_msg_md, family) + 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
+ },
+ {
"direct packet read for SK_MSG",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists