[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8744809-4f99-5268-da89-0080dd5b3b85@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 00:22:45 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
borkmann@...earbox.net, ast@...nel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf: Add mtu checking to FIB forwarding
helper
On 05/17/2018 06:09 PM, David Ahern wrote:
> Add check that egress MTU can handle packet to be forwarded. If
> the MTU is less than the packet lenght, return 0 meaning the
> packet is expected to continue up the stack for help - eg.,
> fragmenting the packet or sending an ICMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 6d0d1560bd70..c47c47a75d4b 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4098,6 +4098,7 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,
> struct fib_nh *nh;
> struct flowi4 fl4;
> int err;
> + u32 mtu;
>
> dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, params->ifindex);
> if (unlikely(!dev))
> @@ -4149,6 +4150,10 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,
> if (res.fi->fib_nhs > 1)
> fib_select_path(net, &res, &fl4, NULL);
>
> + mtu = ip_mtu_from_fib_result(&res, params->ipv4_dst);
> + if (params->tot_len > mtu)
> + return 0;
> +
> nh = &res.fi->fib_nh[res.nh_sel];
>
> /* do not handle lwt encaps right now */
> @@ -4188,6 +4193,7 @@ static int bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,
> struct flowi6 fl6;
> int strict = 0;
> int oif;
> + u32 mtu;
>
> /* link local addresses are never forwarded */
> if (rt6_need_strict(dst) || rt6_need_strict(src))
> @@ -4250,6 +4256,10 @@ static int bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(struct net *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,
> fl6.flowi6_oif, NULL,
> strict);
>
> + mtu = ip6_mtu_from_fib6(f6i, dst, src);
> + if (params->tot_len > mtu)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (f6i->fib6_nh.nh_lwtstate)
> return 0;
Could you elaborate how this interacts in tc BPF use case where you have e.g.
GSO packets and tot_len from aggregated packets would definitely be larger
than MTU (e.g. see is_skb_forwardable() as one example on such checks)? Should
this be an opt-in via a new flag for the helper?
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists