[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ca9e327-736d-4372-10a0-b90dbafb797b@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:56:16 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sh_eth: Change platform check to CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS
On 05/18/2018 01:52 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Since commit 9b5ba0df4ea4f940 ("ARM: shmobile: Introduce ARCH_RENESAS")
> is CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS a more appropriate platform check than the legacy
"If" should follow, not precede the option as this is not a question. :-)
> CONFIG_ARCH_SHMOBILE, hence use the former.
>
> Renesas SuperH SH-Mobile SoCs are still covered by the CONFIG_CPU_SH4
> check.
>
> This will allow to drop ARCH_SHMOBILE on ARM and ARM64 in the near
> future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists