| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180518135127.1f886b67@cakuba>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 13:51:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Cc: <peterz@...radead.org>, <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/7] tools/bpftool: add perf subcommand
On Thu, 17 May 2018 22:03:10 -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
> The new command "bpftool perf [show | list]" will traverse
> all processes under /proc, and if any fd is associated
> with a perf event, it will print out related perf event
> information. Documentation is also added.
Thanks for the changes, it looks good with some minor nits which can be
addressed as follow up if there is no other need to respin. Please
consider it:
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Below is an example to show the results using bcc commands.
> Running the following 4 bcc commands:
> kprobe: trace.py '__x64_sys_nanosleep'
> kretprobe: trace.py 'r::__x64_sys_nanosleep'
> tracepoint: trace.py 't:syscalls:sys_enter_nanosleep'
> uprobe: trace.py 'p:/home/yhs/a.out:main'
>
> The bpftool command line and result:
>
> $ bpftool perf
> pid 21711 fd 5: prog_id 5 kprobe func __x64_sys_write offset 0
> pid 21765 fd 5: prog_id 7 kretprobe func __x64_sys_nanosleep offset 0
> pid 21767 fd 5: prog_id 8 tracepoint sys_enter_nanosleep
> pid 21800 fd 5: prog_id 9 uprobe filename /home/yhs/a.out offset 1159
>
> $ bpftool -j perf
> {"pid":21711,"fd":5,"prog_id":5,"attach_info":"kprobe","func":"__x64_sys_write","offset":0}, \
> {"pid":21765,"fd":5,"prog_id":7,"attach_info":"kretprobe","func":"__x64_sys_nanosleep","offset":0}, \
> {"pid":21767,"fd":5,"prog_id":8,"attach_info":"tracepoint","tracepoint":"sys_enter_nanosleep"}, \
> {"pid":21800,"fd":5,"prog_id":9,"attach_info":"uprobe","filename":"/home/yhs/a.out","offset":1159}
nit: this is now an array
> $ bpftool prog
> 5: kprobe name probe___x64_sys tag e495a0c82f2c7a8d gpl
> loaded_at 2018-05-15T04:46:37-0700 uid 0
> xlated 200B not jited memlock 4096B map_ids 4
> 7: kprobe name probe___x64_sys tag f2fdee479a503abf gpl
> loaded_at 2018-05-15T04:48:32-0700 uid 0
> xlated 200B not jited memlock 4096B map_ids 7
> 8: tracepoint name tracepoint__sys tag 5390badef2395fcf gpl
> loaded_at 2018-05-15T04:48:48-0700 uid 0
> xlated 200B not jited memlock 4096B map_ids 8
> 9: kprobe name probe_main_1 tag 0a87bdc2e2953b6d gpl
> loaded_at 2018-05-15T04:49:52-0700 uid 0
> xlated 200B not jited memlock 4096B map_ids 9
>
> $ ps ax | grep "python ./trace.py"
> 21711 pts/0 T 0:03 python ./trace.py __x64_sys_write
> 21765 pts/0 S+ 0:00 python ./trace.py r::__x64_sys_nanosleep
> 21767 pts/2 S+ 0:00 python ./trace.py t:syscalls:sys_enter_nanosleep
> 21800 pts/3 S+ 0:00 python ./trace.py p:/home/yhs/a.out:main
> 22374 pts/1 S+ 0:00 grep --color=auto python ./trace.py
>
> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> index b301c9b..3680ad4 100644
> --- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> +++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/bash-completion/bpftool
> @@ -448,6 +448,15 @@ _bpftool()
> ;;
> esac
> ;;
> + cgroup)
s/cgroup/perf/ :)
> + case $command in
> + *)
> + [[ $prev == $object ]] && \
> + COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W 'help \
> + show list' -- "$cur" ) )
> + ;;
> + esac
> + ;;
> esac
> } &&
> complete -F _bpftool bpftool
> +static int show_proc(const char *fpath, const struct stat *sb,
> + int tflag, struct FTW *ftwbuf)
> +{
> + __u64 probe_offset, probe_addr;
> + __u32 prog_id, attach_info;
> + int err, pid = 0, fd = 0;
> + const char *pch;
> + char buf[4096];
> +
> + /* prefix always /proc */
> + pch = fpath + 5;
> + if (*pch == '\0')
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* pid should be all numbers */
> + pch++;
> + while (isdigit(*pch)) {
> + pid = pid * 10 + *pch - '0';
> + pch++;
> + }
> + if (*pch == '\0')
> + return 0;
> + if (*pch != '/')
> + return FTW_SKIP_SUBTREE;
> +
> + /* check /proc/<pid>/fd directory */
> + pch++;
> + if (strncmp(pch, "fd", 2))
> + return FTW_SKIP_SUBTREE;
> + pch += 2;
> + if (*pch == '\0')
> + return 0;
> + if (*pch != '/')
> + return FTW_SKIP_SUBTREE;
> +
> + /* check /proc/<pid>/fd/<fd_num> */
> + pch++;
> + while (isdigit(*pch)) {
> + fd = fd * 10 + *pch - '0';
> + pch++;
> + }
> + if (*pch != '\0')
> + return FTW_SKIP_SUBTREE;
> +
> + /* query (pid, fd) for potential perf events */
> + err = bpf_task_fd_query(pid, fd, 0, buf, sizeof(buf), &prog_id,
> + &attach_info, &probe_offset, &probe_addr);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return 0;
nit: it could be nice from user perspective to detect whether kernel
supports the command and fail if not. Otherwise user is not sure
if there is no output because kernel lacks support or because
there were really no attached progs. Just a thought, not really
a requirement.
> + if (json_output)
> + print_perf_json(pid, fd, prog_id, attach_info, buf, probe_offset,
> + probe_addr);
> + else
> + print_perf_plain(pid, fd, prog_id, attach_info, buf, probe_offset,
> + probe_addr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int do_show(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> + int err = 0, nopenfd = 16;
> + int flags = FTW_ACTIONRETVAL | FTW_PHYS;
nit: reverse xmas tree
> + if (json_output)
> + jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
> + if (nftw("/proc", show_proc, nopenfd, flags) == -1) {
> + p_err("%s", strerror(errno));
> + err = -1;
> + }
> + if (json_output)
> + jsonw_end_array(json_wtr);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists