netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180518071753.4768-5-bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 16:17:52 +0900
From:   Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc:     Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: test_sockmap, fix data verification

When data verification is enabled, some tests fail because verification is done
incorrectly. Following changes fix it.

- Identify the size of data block to be verified
- Reset verification counter when data block size is reached
- Fixed the value printed in case of verification failure

Fixes: 16962b2404ac ("bpf: sockmap, add selftests")
Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
index f79397513362..e8faf4596dac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c
@@ -337,8 +337,15 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 		int fd_flags = O_NONBLOCK;
 		struct timeval timeout;
 		float total_bytes;
+		int bytes_cnt = 0;
+		int chunk_sz;
 		fd_set w;
 
+		if (opt->sendpage)
+			chunk_sz = iov_length * cnt;
+		else
+			chunk_sz = iov_length * iov_count;
+
 		fcntl(fd, fd_flags);
 		total_bytes = (float)iov_count * (float)iov_length * (float)cnt;
 		err = clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &s->start);
@@ -388,9 +395,14 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 							errno = -EIO;
 							fprintf(stderr,
 								"detected data corruption @iov[%i]:%i %02x != %02x, %02x ?= %02x\n",
-								i, j, d[j], k - 1, d[j+1], k + 1);
+								i, j, d[j], k - 1, d[j+1], k);
 							goto out_errno;
 						}
+						bytes_cnt++;
+						if (bytes_cnt == chunk_sz) {
+							k = 0;
+							bytes_cnt = 0;
+						}
 						recv--;
 					}
 				}
-- 
2.14.3