[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180518085812.GB24387@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:58:12 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/42] isdn: replace ->proc_fops with ->proc_show
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:43:46AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > iif->ctr.release_appl = gigaset_release_appl;
> > iif->ctr.send_message = gigaset_send_message;
> > - iif->ctr.procinfo = gigaset_procinfo;
>
> Is this intentional? You didn't touch the procinfo method in the other ISDN
> drivers, as far as I can see.
>
> (If it was intentional, gigaset_procinfo() can of course be removed.)
Already fixed in the branch in Als tree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists