[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de8c2add-8cd4-fa01-83dc-8595d9db9a7f@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:11:49 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, idosch@...lanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
ganeshgr@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
john.hurley@...ronome.com, dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
dsahern@...il.com, vijaya.guvva@...ium.com,
satananda.burla@...ium.com, raghu.vatsavayi@...ium.com,
felix.manlunas@...ium.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
sathya.perla@...adcom.com, vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com,
tariqt@...lanox.com, eranbe@...lanox.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next RFC 04/12] dsa: set devlink port attrs for dsa
ports
On 05/18/2018 06:45 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> What benefit does it have to register unused ports? What is a usecase
>> for them. Like Florian, I also think they should not be registered.
>
> Hi Jiri
>
> They physically exist, so we are accurately describing the hardware by
> registering them.
You are right that the driver is advertising a number of ports that does
not match what is being expected. We unfortunately do not have a good
API for specifying e.g: a sparse port allocation.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists