netdev - Re: [patch net-next 0/5] devlink: introduce port flavours and common phys_port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180519.163142.1256790782843660338.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 19 May 2018 16:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     jiri@...nulli.us, netdev@...r.kernel.org, idosch@...lanox.com,
        jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        ganeshgr@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com,
        simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
        john.hurley@...ronome.com, dirk.vandermerwe@...ronome.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
        dsahern@...il.com, vijaya.guvva@...ium.com,
        satananda.burla@...ium.com, raghu.vatsavayi@...ium.com,
        felix.manlunas@...ium.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
        sathya.perla@...adcom.com, vasundhara-v.volam@...adcom.com,
        tariqt@...lanox.com, eranbe@...lanox.com,
        jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/5] devlink: introduce port flavours and
 common phys_port_name generation

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:34:25 -0700

> On 05/18/2018 12:28 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> 
>> This patchset resolves 2 issues we have right now:
>> 1) There are many netdevices / ports in the system, for port, pf, vf
>>    represenatation but the user has no way to see which is which
>> 2) The ndo_get_phys_port_name is implemented in each driver separatelly,
>>    which may lead to inconsistent names between drivers.
>> 
>> This patchset introduces port flavours which should address the first
>> problem. In this initial patchset, I focus on DSA and their port
>> flavours. As a follow-up, I plan to add PF and VF representor flavours.
>> However, that needs additional dependencies in drivers (nfp, mlx5).
>> 
>> The common phys_port_name generation is used by mlxsw. An example output
>> for mlxsw looks like this:
 ...
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>

Series applied, thanks everyone.