[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180521212422.GA25067@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 23:24:23 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] r8169: perform reset synchronously in
__rtl8169_resume
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> :
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> index 75dfac024..1eb4f625a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> @@ -7327,9 +7327,9 @@ static void __rtl8169_resume(struct net_device *dev)
> rtl_lock_work(tp);
> napi_enable(&tp->napi);
> set_bit(RTL_FLAG_TASK_ENABLED, tp->wk.flags);
> + if (netif_running(dev))
> + rtl_reset_work(tp);
> rtl_unlock_work(tp);
> -
> - rtl_schedule_task(tp, RTL_FLAG_TASK_RESET_PENDING);
> }
>
> static int rtl8169_resume(struct device *device)
netif_running() returns true before rtl_open(): issuing rtl_reset_work()
synchronously against uninitialized rings right at the start of rtl_open()
won't work as expected.
pm_runtime_get_sync() could be issued later in rtl_open() (but I would
not mind something different with runtime_{resume/suspend} in open/close).
--
Ueimor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists