netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] tools: bpftool: add delimiters to multi-function JITed dumps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180522125544.541c68c8@cakuba>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 12:55:44 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] tools: bpftool: add delimiters to
 multi-function JITed dumps

On Tue, 22 May 2018 22:46:13 +0530, Sandipan Das wrote:
> +		if (info.nr_jited_func_lens && info.jited_func_lens) {
> +			struct kernel_sym *sym = NULL;
> +			unsigned char *img = buf;
> +			__u64 *ksyms = NULL;
> +			__u32 *lens;
> +			__u32 i;
> +
> +			if (info.nr_jited_ksyms) {
> +				kernel_syms_load(&dd);
> +				ksyms = (__u64 *) info.jited_ksyms;
> +			}
> +
> +			lens = (__u32 *) info.jited_func_lens;
> +			for (i = 0; i < info.nr_jited_func_lens; i++) {
> +				if (ksyms) {
> +					sym = kernel_syms_search(&dd, ksyms[i]);
> +					if (sym)
> +						printf("%s:\n", sym->name);
> +					else
> +						printf("%016llx:\n", ksyms[i]);
> +				}
> +
> +				disasm_print_insn(img, lens[i], opcodes, name);
> +				img += lens[i];
> +				printf("\n");
> +			}
> +		} else {

The output doesn't seem to be JSON-compatible :(  We try to make sure
all bpftool command can produce valid JSON when run with -j (or -p)
switch.

Would it be possible to make each function a separate JSON object with
"name" and "insn" array?  Would that work?