[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180522205612.GD7502@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:56:12 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dledford@...hat.com,
Sindhu Devale <sindhu.devale@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next] i40iw/i40e: Remove link dependency on i40e
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:38:31PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Sindhu Devale <sindhu.devale@...el.com>
>
> Currently i40iw is dependent on i40e symbols
> i40e_register_client and i40e_unregister_client due to
> which i40iw cannot be loaded without i40e being loaded.
>
> This patch allows RDMA driver to build and load without
> linking to LAN driver and without LAN driver being loaded
> first. Once the LAN driver is loaded, the RDMA driver
> is notified through the netdevice notifiers to register
> as client to the LAN driver. Add function pointers to IDC
> register/unregister in the private VSI structure. This
> allows a RDMA driver to build without linking to i40e.
Why would you want to do this? The rdma driver is non-functional
without the ethernet driver, so why on earth would we want to defeat
the module dependency mechanism?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists