lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180522220524.GE30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 23:05:24 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/31] aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:30:45PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> +static inline void __aio_poll_complete(struct poll_iocb *req, __poll_t mask)
> +{
> +	struct aio_kiocb *iocb = container_of(req, struct aio_kiocb, poll);
> +
> +	fput(req->file);
> +	aio_complete(iocb, mangle_poll(mask), 0);
> +}

Careful.

> +static int aio_poll_cancel(struct kiocb *iocb)
> +{
> +	struct aio_kiocb *aiocb = container_of(iocb, struct aio_kiocb, rw);
> +	struct poll_iocb *req = &aiocb->poll;
> +	struct wait_queue_head *head = req->head;
> +	bool found = false;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&head->lock);
> +	found = __aio_poll_remove(req);
> +	spin_unlock(&head->lock);

What's to guarantee that req->head has not been freed by that point?
Look: wakeup finds ->ctx_lock held, so it leaves the sucker on the
list, removes it from queue and schedules the call of __aio_poll_complete().
Which gets executed just as we hit aio_poll_cancel(), starting with fput().

You really want to do aio_complete() before fput().  That way you know that
req->wait is alive and well at least until iocb gets removed from the list.

> +	req->events = demangle_poll(iocb->aio_buf) | POLLERR | POLLHUP;

EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP, please.  The values are equal to POLLERR and POLLHUP on
all architectures, but let's avoid misannotations.

> +	spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> +	list_add_tail(&aiocb->ki_list, &ctx->active_reqs);
> +
> +	spin_lock(&req->head->lock);
> +	mask = req->file->f_op->poll_mask(req->file, req->events);
> +	if (!mask)
> +		__add_wait_queue(req->head, &req->wait);

ITYM
	if (!mask) {
		__add_wait_queue(req->head, &req->wait);
		list_add_tail(&aiocb->ki_list, &ctx->active_reqs);
	}
What's the point of exposing it to aio_poll_cancel() when it has
never been on waitqueue?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ