[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180524143547.GX4828@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:35:47 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
between commit:
2eabd764cb5512f1338 ("net: ipv4: add missing RTA_TABLE to rtm_ipv4_policy")
from the net tree and commit:
404eb77ea766260c45c ("ipv4: support sport, dport and ip_proto in RTM_GETROUTE")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
diff --cc net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
index e66172aaf241,897ae92dff0f..000000000000
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@@ -649,7 -649,9 +649,10 @@@ const struct nla_policy rtm_ipv4_policy
[RTA_ENCAP] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
[RTA_UID] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
[RTA_MARK] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [RTA_TABLE] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
+ [RTA_IP_PROTO] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
+ [RTA_SPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
+ [RTA_DPORT] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
};
static int rtm_to_fib_config(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists