[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d0xjzpf2.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:10:57 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com, davem@...emloft.net,
razvan.stefanescu@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] net: bridge: Extract boilerplate around switchdev_port_obj_*()
Hi Petr,
Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com> writes:
> -static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
> - u16 vid, u16 flags)
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid, u16 flags)
> {
> struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
> .obj.orig_dev = dev,
> @@ -89,12 +88,29 @@ static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
> .vid_begin = vid,
> .vid_end = vid,
> };
> - int err;
>
> + return switchdev_port_obj_add(dev, &v.obj);
> +}
> +
> +static int br_switchdev_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
> +{
> + struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan v = {
> + .obj.orig_dev = dev,
> + .obj.id = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN,
> + .vid_begin = vid,
> + .vid_end = vid,
> + };
> +
> + return switchdev_port_obj_del(dev, &v.obj);
> +}
Shouldn't they be br_switchdev_port_vlan_add (or similar) implemented in
net/bridge/br_switchdev.c instead, since they are VLAN specific?
Other than that, the change looks good!
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists