netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: bridge: Notify about bridge VLANs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y3g7lms6.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:   Fri, 25 May 2018 12:31:37 -0400
From:   Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     jiri@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        razvan.stefanescu@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        stephen@...workplumber.org, andrew@...n.ch,
        nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: bridge: Notify about bridge VLANs

Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> writes:

> Andrew, Vivien, if the following hunks get applied are we possibly
> breaking mv88e6xxx? This is the use case that is really missing IMHO at
> the moment in DSA: we cannot control the VLAN membership and attributes
> of the CPU port(s), so either we make it always tagged in every VLAN
> (not great), or we introduce the ability to target the CPU port which is
> what Petr's patches + mine do.

Your change looks good to me. mv88e6xxx programs the DSA and CPU ports'
membership as "unmodified" (i.e. "as-is", which is a Marvell feature),
so that shouldn't change the current behavior.


Thanks,

        Vivien