[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180526045338.10993-2-jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 21:53:25 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
nogahf@...lanox.com, yuvalm@...lanox.com, gerlitz.or@...il.com,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/14] nfp: return -EOPNOTSUPP from .ndo_get_phys_port_name for VFs
After recent change we started returning 0 from
ndo_get_phys_port_name for VFs. The name parameter for
ndo_get_phys_port_name is not initialized by the stack so
this can lead to a crash. We should have kept returning
-EOPNOTSUPP in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
index eea11e881bf5..1f572896d1ee 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
@@ -3286,11 +3286,12 @@ nfp_net_get_phys_port_name(struct net_device *netdev, char *name, size_t len)
if (nn->port)
return nfp_port_get_phys_port_name(netdev, name, len);
- if (!nn->dp.is_vf) {
- n = snprintf(name, len, "%d", nn->id);
- if (n >= len)
- return -EINVAL;
- }
+ if (nn->dp.is_vf)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ n = snprintf(name, len, "%d", nn->id);
+ if (n >= len)
+ return -EINVAL;
return 0;
}
--
2.17.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists