[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180528063303.GA15094@splinter.mtl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 09:33:03 +0300
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, petrm@...lanox.com,
mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mlxsw: spectrum: Forbid creation of VLAN 1 over
port/LAG
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:55:58AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > index ca38a30fbe91..adc6ab2cf429 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
> > @@ -4433,6 +4433,11 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_netdevice_port_upper_event(struct net_device *lower_dev,
> > NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can not put a VLAN on an OVS port");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > + if (is_vlan_dev(upper_dev) &&
> > + vlan_dev_vlan_id(upper_dev) == 1) {
> > + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Creating a VLAN device with VID 1 is unsupported: VLAN 1 carries untagged traffic");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
>
> Hi Ido
>
> Would ENOTSUPP be a better return code. VLAN 1 is valid, you just
> don't support it.
OK, makes sense. We currently use EINVAL for such errors, but we can
convert to EOPNOTSUPP in net-next.
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists