netdev - Re: [PATCH] bpfilter: fix building without CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 08:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     arnd@...db.de
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpfilter: fix building without CONFIG_INET

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 11:55:06 +0200

> bpfilter_process_sockopt is a callback that gets called from
> ip_setsockopt() and ip_getsockopt(). However, when CONFIG_INET is
> disabled, it never gets called at all, and assigning a function to the
> callback pointer results in a link failure:
> 
> net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.o: In function `__stop_umh':
> bpfilter_kern.c:(.text.unlikely+0x3): undefined reference to `bpfilter_process_sockopt'
> net/bpfilter/bpfilter_kern.o: In function `load_umh':
> bpfilter_kern.c:(.init.text+0x73): undefined reference to `bpfilter_process_sockopt'
> 
> Since there is no caller in this configuration, I assume we can
> simply make the assignment conditional.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Applied, thanks Arnd.