[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edda0dc8-e4a8-217b-4c53-865f48990bd6@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 17:42:31 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, moshe@...lanox.com
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, aring@...atatu.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/19] inet: frags: bring rhashtables to IP
defrag
On 30/05/2018 10:36 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:20 AM Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
>> Not sure, the transmit BW you get is higher than what we saw.
>> Anyway, we'll check this.
>
> That is on a 40Gbit test bed (mlx4 cx/3), maybe you were using a 10Gbit NIC
> ?
>
It is a ConnectX-4 50G (mlx5).
Moshe is trying out the tuning you suggested.
He'll update once he's done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists