lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edda0dc8-e4a8-217b-4c53-865f48990bd6@mellanox.com>
Date:   Wed, 30 May 2018 17:42:31 +0300
From:   Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>, moshe@...lanox.com
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, aring@...atatu.com,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
        Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>,
        Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/19] inet: frags: bring rhashtables to IP
 defrag



On 30/05/2018 10:36 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:20 AM Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com> wrote:
> 
>> Not sure, the transmit BW you get is higher than what we saw.
>> Anyway, we'll check this.
> 
> That is on a 40Gbit test bed (mlx4 cx/3), maybe you were using a 10Gbit NIC
> ?
> 

It is a ConnectX-4 50G (mlx5).

Moshe is trying out the tuning you suggested.
He'll update once he's done.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ