netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: Add support to configure SR-IOV VF minimum and maximum queues.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACKFLi=-QVePYwAiG+boXoH0tdWTaM1ZRyV4qxsj0Au1w5PKBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 May 2018 20:19:54 -0700
From:   Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To:     "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: Add support to configure SR-IOV VF
 minimum and maximum queues.

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar
<sridhar.samudrala@...el.com> wrote:

>
> Isn't ndo_set_vf_xxx() considered a legacy interface and not planned to be
> extended?

I didn't know about that.

> Shouldn't we enable this via ethtool on the port representor netdev?
>
>

We discussed about this.  ethtool on the VF representor will only work
in switchdev mode and also will not support min/max values.