[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJN8=ZdnErcwMnEyhywksQLONL1t7DX=UoAJhFv4t0PrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 03:36:17 -0400
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, aring@...atatu.com,
moshe@...lanox.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/19] inet: frags: bring rhashtables to IP defrag
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:20 AM Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com> wrote:
> Not sure, the transmit BW you get is higher than what we saw.
> Anyway, we'll check this.
That is on a 40Gbit test bed (mlx4 cx/3), maybe you were using a 10Gbit NIC
?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists