[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180530100319.GB5378@asgard.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:03:19 +0200
From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>
To: Song Liu <liu.song.a23@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf: enforce usage of __aligned_u64 in the UAPI
header
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:35:09AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> I think these changes are not necessary. Is it a general guidance to
> only use 64-bit aligned
> variables in UAPI headers?
Not really, but it allows avoiding most alignment issues like the one
mentioned in the previous patch and in the referenced RDMA patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists