[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180531112311.GA29517@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 13:23:11 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: peter pi <tiangangpi@...il.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: properly initialize xt_table_info structure
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:40:40PM +0800, peter pi wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> My test method is very simple:
> 1, In copy_to_user, add a function call like my_examine(from, n) to check
> every 8 bytes. There is an kernel function called virt_addr_valid which
> can check if the value is a address value.
> 2, Print a kernel log when there is a leak detected in function my_examine
> 3, Run iptables-save or ip6tables-save in shell, it will hit the kernel
> code path of the problem
>
>
> Because my test code is specified for Pixel 2, so I think you can write the
> test code yourself just about 10 lines code
Any chance you can test this on a more modern kernel, like 4.14 or
newer on a normal system?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists