[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1527753499-32124-8-git-send-email-vladbu@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 10:58:15 +0300
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
jiri@...nulli.us, pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
fw@...len.de, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, vladbu@...lanox.com, keescook@...omium.org,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com, kliteyn@...lanox.com,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 07/11] net: sched: implement reference counted action release
Implement helper delete function that uses new action ops 'delete', instead
of destroying action directly. This is required so act API could delete
actions by index, without holding any references to action that is being
deleted.
Implement function __tcf_action_put() that releases reference to action and
frees it, if necessary. Refactor action deletion code to use new put
function and not to rely on rtnl lock. Remove rtnl lock assertions that are
no longer needed.
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
---
Changes from V1 to V2:
- Removed redundant actions ops lookup during delete.
- Assume all actions have delete implemented and don't check for it
explicitly.
- Rearrange variable definitions in tcf_action_delete.
net/sched/act_api.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
net/sched/cls_api.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/act_api.c b/net/sched/act_api.c
index 0f31f09946ab..a023873db713 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_api.c
@@ -90,21 +90,39 @@ static void free_tcf(struct tc_action *p)
kfree(p);
}
-static void tcf_idr_remove(struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo, struct tc_action *p)
+static void tcf_action_cleanup(struct tc_action *p)
{
- spin_lock(&idrinfo->lock);
- idr_remove(&idrinfo->action_idr, p->tcfa_index);
- spin_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
+ if (p->ops->cleanup)
+ p->ops->cleanup(p);
+
gen_kill_estimator(&p->tcfa_rate_est);
free_tcf(p);
}
+static int __tcf_action_put(struct tc_action *p, bool bind)
+{
+ struct tcf_idrinfo *idrinfo = p->idrinfo;
+
+ if (refcount_dec_and_lock(&p->tcfa_refcnt, &idrinfo->lock)) {
+ if (bind)
+ atomic_dec(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
+ idr_remove(&idrinfo->action_idr, p->tcfa_index);
+ spin_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
+
+ tcf_action_cleanup(p);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ if (bind)
+ atomic_dec(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int __tcf_idr_release(struct tc_action *p, bool bind, bool strict)
{
int ret = 0;
- ASSERT_RTNL();
-
/* Release with strict==1 and bind==0 is only called through act API
* interface (classifiers always bind). Only case when action with
* positive reference count and zero bind count can exist is when it was
@@ -118,18 +136,11 @@ int __tcf_idr_release(struct tc_action *p, bool bind, bool strict)
* are acceptable.
*/
if (p) {
- if (bind)
- atomic_dec(&p->tcfa_bindcnt);
- else if (strict && atomic_read(&p->tcfa_bindcnt) > 0)
+ if (!bind && strict && atomic_read(&p->tcfa_bindcnt) > 0)
return -EPERM;
- if (atomic_read(&p->tcfa_bindcnt) <= 0 &&
- refcount_dec_and_test(&p->tcfa_refcnt)) {
- if (p->ops->cleanup)
- p->ops->cleanup(p);
- tcf_idr_remove(p->idrinfo, p);
+ if (__tcf_action_put(p, bind))
ret = ACT_P_DELETED;
- }
}
return ret;
@@ -340,11 +351,7 @@ int tcf_idr_delete_index(struct tc_action_net *tn, u32 index)
p->tcfa_index));
spin_unlock(&idrinfo->lock);
- if (p->ops->cleanup)
- p->ops->cleanup(p);
-
- gen_kill_estimator(&p->tcfa_rate_est);
- free_tcf(p);
+ tcf_action_cleanup(p);
module_put(owner);
return 0;
}
@@ -615,6 +622,11 @@ int tcf_action_destroy(struct list_head *actions, int bind)
return ret;
}
+static int tcf_action_put(struct tc_action *p)
+{
+ return __tcf_action_put(p, false);
+}
+
int
tcf_action_dump_old(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int bind, int ref)
{
@@ -1092,6 +1104,35 @@ static int tca_action_flush(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
return err;
}
+static int tcf_action_delete(struct net *net, struct list_head *actions,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct tc_action *a, *tmp;
+ u32 act_index;
+ int ret;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(a, tmp, actions, list) {
+ const struct tc_action_ops *ops = a->ops;
+
+ /* Actions can be deleted concurrently so we must save their
+ * type and id to search again after reference is released.
+ */
+ act_index = a->tcfa_index;
+
+ list_del(&a->list);
+ if (tcf_action_put(a)) {
+ /* last reference, action was deleted concurrently */
+ module_put(ops->owner);
+ } else {
+ /* now do the delete */
+ ret = ops->delete(net, act_index);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int
tcf_del_notify(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *n, struct list_head *actions,
u32 portid, size_t attr_size, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
@@ -1112,7 +1153,7 @@ tcf_del_notify(struct net *net, struct nlmsghdr *n, struct list_head *actions,
}
/* now do the delete */
- ret = tcf_action_destroy(actions, 0);
+ ret = tcf_action_delete(net, actions, extack);
if (ret < 0) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Failed to delete TC action");
kfree_skb(skb);
@@ -1164,7 +1205,6 @@ tca_action_gd(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla, struct nlmsghdr *n,
if (event == RTM_GETACTION)
ret = tcf_get_notify(net, portid, n, &actions, event, extack);
else { /* delete */
- cleanup_a(&actions, 1); /* lookup took reference */
ret = tcf_del_notify(net, n, &actions, portid, attr_size, extack);
if (ret)
goto err;
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 28480ec1b76e..90b758778756 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -1418,7 +1418,6 @@ void tcf_exts_destroy(struct tcf_exts *exts)
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
LIST_HEAD(actions);
- ASSERT_RTNL();
tcf_exts_to_list(exts, &actions);
tcf_action_destroy(&actions, TCA_ACT_UNBIND);
kfree(exts->actions);
--
2.7.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists