netdev - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180601085243.3p33sctlpckcq7vl@ast-mbp>
Date:   Fri, 1 Jun 2018 04:52:45 -0400
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 01:59:43PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 31 May 2018 07:38:55 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 May 2018 13:25:48 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the net-next tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > 
> > > x86_64-linux-ld: unknown architecture of input file `net/bpfilter/bpfilter_umh.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output
> > > 
> > > Caused by commit
> > > 
> > >   d2ba09c17a06 ("net: add skeleton of bpfilter kernel module")
> > > 
> > > In my builds, the host is PowerPC 64 LE ...
> > > 
> > > I have reverted that commit along with
> > > 
> > >   61a552eb487f ("bpfilter: fix build dependency")
> > >   13405468f49d ("bpfilter: don't pass O_CREAT when opening console for debug")
> > > 
> > > for today.  
> > 
> > I am still getting this failure (well, at least yesterday I did).
> 
> Still happened today.  My guess is that bpfilter_umh needs to be built
> with the kernel compiler (not the host compiler - since ir is meant to
> run on the some machine as the kernel, right?) but will require the
> kernel architecture libc etc
> 
> 
> I replaced the reverts above with the following:
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 13:33:28 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net: bpfilter: mark as BROKEN for now
> 
> This does not build in a cross compile environment
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  net/bpfilter/Kconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bpfilter/Kconfig b/net/bpfilter/Kconfig
> index a948b072c28f..ea4be72fdf6e 100644
> --- a/net/bpfilter/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/bpfilter/Kconfig
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ menuconfig BPFILTER
>  	bool "BPF based packet filtering framework (BPFILTER)"
>  	default n
>  	depends on NET && BPF && INET
> +	depends on BROKEN

yeah. that's another option.
Sorry for delay. networking folks are traveling to netconf.
The issue is being discussed here:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/921597/

Currently we're thinking how to add a check that hostcc's arch
is equal to cross-cc target arch and ideally equal to arch
of the host where it will be run.