| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <50e61e4433b3a10729db72f62b1e7403980a4786.1527971376.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2018 22:53:38 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/11] bpf: test case for map pointer poison with calls/branches
Add several test cases where the same or different map pointers
originate from different paths in the program and execute a map
lookup or tail call at a common location.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
include/linux/filter.h | 10 ++
tools/include/linux/filter.h | 10 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index d90abda..6fd375fe 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -289,6 +289,16 @@ struct xdp_buff;
.off = OFF, \
.imm = 0 })
+/* Relative call */
+
+#define BPF_CALL_REL(TGT) \
+ ((struct bpf_insn) { \
+ .code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, \
+ .dst_reg = 0, \
+ .src_reg = BPF_PSEUDO_CALL, \
+ .off = 0, \
+ .imm = TGT })
+
/* Function call */
#define BPF_EMIT_CALL(FUNC) \
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/filter.h b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
index c5e512d..af55acf 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -263,6 +263,16 @@
#define BPF_LD_MAP_FD(DST, MAP_FD) \
BPF_LD_IMM64_RAW(DST, BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD, MAP_FD)
+/* Relative call */
+
+#define BPF_CALL_REL(TGT) \
+ ((struct bpf_insn) { \
+ .code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, \
+ .dst_reg = 0, \
+ .src_reg = BPF_PSEUDO_CALL, \
+ .off = 0, \
+ .imm = TGT })
+
/* Program exit */
#define BPF_EXIT_INSN() \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 4b4f015..7cb1d74 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
#define MAX_INSNS BPF_MAXINSNS
#define MAX_FIXUPS 8
-#define MAX_NR_MAPS 4
+#define MAX_NR_MAPS 7
#define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all
#define TEST_DATA_LEN 64
@@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ struct bpf_test {
int fixup_map1[MAX_FIXUPS];
int fixup_map2[MAX_FIXUPS];
int fixup_map3[MAX_FIXUPS];
- int fixup_prog[MAX_FIXUPS];
+ int fixup_map4[MAX_FIXUPS];
+ int fixup_prog1[MAX_FIXUPS];
+ int fixup_prog2[MAX_FIXUPS];
int fixup_map_in_map[MAX_FIXUPS];
const char *errstr;
const char *errstr_unpriv;
@@ -2769,7 +2771,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 1 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 1 },
.errstr_unpriv = "R3 leaks addr into helper",
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
@@ -2856,7 +2858,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 1 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 42,
},
@@ -2870,7 +2872,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 1 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 41,
},
@@ -2884,7 +2886,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 1 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 1,
},
@@ -2898,7 +2900,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 1 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@@ -2912,7 +2914,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 1 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 1 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 2,
},
@@ -2926,7 +2928,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
- .fixup_prog = { 2 },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 2 },
.result = ACCEPT,
.retval = 42,
},
@@ -11682,6 +11684,112 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
},
{
+ "calls: two calls returning different map pointers for lookup (hash, array)",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main prog */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_CALL_REL(11),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_CALL_REL(12),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0,
+ offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* subprog 1 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* subprog 2 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .fixup_map2 = { 13 },
+ .fixup_map4 = { 16 },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 1,
+ },
+ {
+ "calls: two calls returning different map pointers for lookup (hash, map in map)",
+ .insns = {
+ /* main prog */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2),
+ BPF_CALL_REL(11),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_CALL_REL(12),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0,
+ offsetof(struct test_val, foo)),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* subprog 1 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* subprog 2 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .fixup_map_in_map = { 16 },
+ .fixup_map4 = { 13 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'map_ptr'",
+ },
+ {
+ "cond: two branches returning different map pointers for lookup (tail, tail)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_6, 0, 3),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 7),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_tail_call),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_prog1 = { 5 },
+ .fixup_prog2 = { 2 },
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "tail_call abusing map_ptr",
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
+ "cond: two branches returning same map pointers for lookup (tail, tail)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 3),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 7),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
+ BPF_FUNC_tail_call),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_prog2 = { 2, 5 },
+ .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 42,
+ },
+ {
"search pruning: all branches should be verified (nop operation)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
@@ -12162,12 +12270,13 @@ static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp)
return len + 1;
}
-static int create_map(uint32_t size_value, uint32_t max_elem)
+static int create_map(uint32_t type, uint32_t size_key,
+ uint32_t size_value, uint32_t max_elem)
{
int fd;
- fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long),
- size_value, max_elem, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ fd = bpf_create_map(type, size_key, size_value, max_elem,
+ type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH ? BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC : 0);
if (fd < 0)
printf("Failed to create hash map '%s'!\n", strerror(errno));
@@ -12200,13 +12309,13 @@ static int create_prog_dummy2(int mfd, int idx)
ARRAY_SIZE(prog), "GPL", 0, NULL, 0);
}
-static int create_prog_array(void)
+static int create_prog_array(uint32_t max_elem, int p1key)
{
- int p1key = 0, p2key = 1;
+ int p2key = 1;
int mfd, p1fd, p2fd;
mfd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, sizeof(int),
- sizeof(int), 4, 0);
+ sizeof(int), max_elem, 0);
if (mfd < 0) {
printf("Failed to create prog array '%s'!\n", strerror(errno));
return -1;
@@ -12261,7 +12370,9 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog,
int *fixup_map1 = test->fixup_map1;
int *fixup_map2 = test->fixup_map2;
int *fixup_map3 = test->fixup_map3;
- int *fixup_prog = test->fixup_prog;
+ int *fixup_map4 = test->fixup_map4;
+ int *fixup_prog1 = test->fixup_prog1;
+ int *fixup_prog2 = test->fixup_prog2;
int *fixup_map_in_map = test->fixup_map_in_map;
if (test->fill_helper)
@@ -12272,7 +12383,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog,
* that really matters is value size in this case.
*/
if (*fixup_map1) {
- map_fds[0] = create_map(sizeof(long long), 1);
+ map_fds[0] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long),
+ sizeof(long long), 1);
do {
prog[*fixup_map1].imm = map_fds[0];
fixup_map1++;
@@ -12280,7 +12392,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog,
}
if (*fixup_map2) {
- map_fds[1] = create_map(sizeof(struct test_val), 1);
+ map_fds[1] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long),
+ sizeof(struct test_val), 1);
do {
prog[*fixup_map2].imm = map_fds[1];
fixup_map2++;
@@ -12288,25 +12401,43 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog,
}
if (*fixup_map3) {
- map_fds[1] = create_map(sizeof(struct other_val), 1);
+ map_fds[2] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long),
+ sizeof(struct other_val), 1);
do {
- prog[*fixup_map3].imm = map_fds[1];
+ prog[*fixup_map3].imm = map_fds[2];
fixup_map3++;
} while (*fixup_map3);
}
- if (*fixup_prog) {
- map_fds[2] = create_prog_array();
+ if (*fixup_map4) {
+ map_fds[3] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, sizeof(int),
+ sizeof(struct test_val), 1);
+ do {
+ prog[*fixup_map4].imm = map_fds[3];
+ fixup_map4++;
+ } while (*fixup_map4);
+ }
+
+ if (*fixup_prog1) {
+ map_fds[4] = create_prog_array(4, 0);
+ do {
+ prog[*fixup_prog1].imm = map_fds[4];
+ fixup_prog1++;
+ } while (*fixup_prog1);
+ }
+
+ if (*fixup_prog2) {
+ map_fds[5] = create_prog_array(8, 7);
do {
- prog[*fixup_prog].imm = map_fds[2];
- fixup_prog++;
- } while (*fixup_prog);
+ prog[*fixup_prog2].imm = map_fds[5];
+ fixup_prog2++;
+ } while (*fixup_prog2);
}
if (*fixup_map_in_map) {
- map_fds[3] = create_map_in_map();
+ map_fds[6] = create_map_in_map();
do {
- prog[*fixup_map_in_map].imm = map_fds[3];
+ prog[*fixup_map_in_map].imm = map_fds[6];
fixup_map_in_map++;
} while (*fixup_map_in_map);
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists