netdev - Re: ANNOUNCE: Enhanced IP v1.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b70e6448-8d34-1d18-0ec0-10e803f489b5@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 3 Jun 2018 15:41:08 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>, Sam Patton <sam@...ancedip.org>
Cc:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Enhanced IP v1.4



On 06/03/2018 01:37 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:

> This is not an inconsequential mechanism that is being proposed. It's
> a modification to IP protocol that is intended to work on the
> Internet, but it looks like the draft hasn't been updated for two
> years and it is not adopted by any IETF working group. I don't see how
> this can go anywhere without IETF support. Also, I suggest that you
> look at the IPv10 proposal since that was very similar in intent. One
> of the reasons that IPv10 shot down was because protocol transition
> mechanisms were more interesting ten years ago than today. IPv6 has
> good traction now. In fact, it's probably the case that it's now
> easier to bring up IPv6 than to try to make IPv4 options work over the
> Internet.

+1

Many hosts do not use IPv4 anymore.

We even have the project making IPv4 support in linux optional.