[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpX0-kS2aJmPz1XCYvx43YFF3TrSzKx36=G5aW45eo4_6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:45:05 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@...lanox.com>,
Shahar Klein <shahark@...lanox.com>,
Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/2018 22:39, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 08:33:25PM CEST, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch
>>>>
>>>> Paul Blakey (2):
>>>> cls_flower: Fix missing free of rhashtable
>>>> cls_flower: Fix comparing of old filter mask with new filter
>>>
>>>
>>> Both are bug fixes and one-line fixes, so definitely should go
>>> to -net tree and -stable tree.
>>
>>
>> I agree.
>>
>
> it's because the commit they fix doesn't exists in net yet.
>
Oh, sorry, my bad, I thought Apr 30 is in a previous release...
Anyway, v2 should be applied cleanly to -net-next or -net after
net-next is merged into it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists