[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1da2f07b-8918-9801-a327-c81e77ee87d9@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:45:29 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Phil Sutter <psutter@...hat.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/11] bpf: avoid retpoline for
lookup/update/delete calls on maps
On 06/04/2018 08:25 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
[...]
> We prefer to have both :) Those of us who like to abbreviate can do
> that, and others can use completions. I personally think Quentin did
> an awesome job on the completions, they cover the entire syntax unlike
> the iproute2 ones and we intend to keep them that way!
Fully agree, both make sense. Personally, I only use abbreviations on
bpftool so far. :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists