netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net_failover: fix net_failover_compute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:31:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc:     sridhar.samudrala@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next] net_failover: fix
 net_failover_compute_features()

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 15:01:25 +0300

> @@ -380,7 +380,8 @@ static rx_handler_result_t net_failover_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
>  
>  static void net_failover_compute_features(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> -	u32 vlan_features = FAILOVER_VLAN_FEATURES & NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL;
> +	netdev_features_t vlan_features = FAILOVER_VLAN_FEATURES |
> +					  NETIF_F_ALL_FOR_ALL;

The type does need to be corrected to netdev_features_t, but the
logical operation is correct.

It's a policy operation that was simply by-hand propagated all
over the place where these kinds of calculations are performed.

So vlan_features is starting with a value of 0 intentionally.