[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7569cbec-8aae-93ff-e442-4c270ac3002b@ni.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:43:15 -0500
From: Jennifer Dahm <jennifer.dahm@...com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Nathan Sullivan <nathan.sullivan@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: macb: Add CAP to disable hardware TX
checksum offloading
Hi Nicolas,
On 06/04/2018 10:13 AM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 25/05/2018 at 23:44, Jennifer Dahm wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> index 3e93df5..a5d564b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
>> @@ -3360,8 +3360,12 @@ static int macb_init(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> dev->hw_features |= MACB_NETIF_LSO;
>> /* Checksum offload is only available on gem with packet
>> buffer */
>> - if (macb_is_gem(bp) && !(bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_FIFO_MODE))
>> - dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
>> + if (macb_is_gem(bp) && !(bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_FIFO_MODE)) {
>> + if (!(bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_DISABLE_TX_HW_CSUM))
>
> Why not the other way around? negating a "disabled" feature is always
> challenge ;-)
>
>> + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
>> + else
>> + dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
>> + }
>> if (bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_SG_DISABLED)
>> dev->hw_features &= ~NETIF_F_SG;
>> dev->features = dev->hw_features;
I can switch the ordering of the if-else clauses if that's what you're
nitpicking. ;)
Alternatively, if you're asking why the flag is used to disable rather
than enable checksum offloading: I was working under the assumption that
this was an isolated bug, and so an opt-out would require less
maintainance than an opt-in. If we discover that this is a problem
across a wide variety of Cadence IP, it would definitely make sense to
replace it with an opt-in (i.e. MACB_CAPS_TX_HW_CSUM_ENABLED).
Best,
Jennifer Dahm
Powered by blists - more mailing lists