[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180608111457.0a9b4cae@xeon-e3>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 11:14:57 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Alexander Aring <aring@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netdevice notifier and device private data
On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 13:34:55 -0400
Alexander Aring <aring@...atatu.com> wrote:
> Hey netdev community,
>
> I am trying to solve some issue which Eric Dumazet points to me by
> commit ca0edb131bdf ("ieee802154: 6lowpan: fix possible NULL deref in
> lowpan_device_event()").
>
> The issue is that dev->type can be changed during runtime. We don't have
> any problems with the netdevice notifier which Eric Dumazet fixed. I am
> bother with another netdevice notifier which is broken because the same
> tun/tap feature and I don't have any dev->$SUBSYSTEM_DEV_POINTER to check
> if this is my netdevice type.
>
> This netdevice notifier will access the dev->priv area which is only
> available for the dev->type which was allocated and initialized with the
> right dev->priv room. If a tap/tun netdevice changed their dev->type I
> might have an illegal read of netdev->priv and I can't confirm that it
> has the data which I cast to it. The reason for that is that tap/tun
> netdevices doesn't run my netdevice init.
>
> I already see code outside who changed tun netdevice to the
> ARPHRD_6LOWPAN type and I suppose they running into this issue.
> (Btw: I don't know why somebody wants to changed that type to
> ARPHRD_6LOWPAN on tun).
>
> My question is:
>
> How we deal with that? Is it forbidden to access dev->priv from a
> global netdevice notifier which only checks for dev->type?
>
> I could solve it like Eric Dumazet and introduce a special
> dev->$SUBSYSTEM_DEV_POINTER and check on it if set. At least tun/tap
> will not set these pointers, then I am sure the netdevice was running
> through my init function. Seems for me the best solution right now and
> I think I will go for it.
>
> I assumed before the data of dev->priv is binded to dev->type.
> This tun/tap feature will break at least my handling and I am not sure
> if there are others users which using dev->priv in netdevice notifier
> and don't check on dev->$SUBSYSTEM_DEV_POINTER if they have one.
>
> Thanks for everybody in advance to solve this issue.
>
> - Alex
notifiers are always called with RTNL mutex held
and dev->type should not change unless RTNL is held.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists