[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180611094022.gvrefejktxzw44i7@netronome.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:40:23 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Wang Lei <wang840925@...il.com>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] KEYS: DNS: fix parsing multiple options
On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 09:20:37AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
>
> My recent fix for dns_resolver_preparse() printing very long strings was
> incomplete, as shown by syzbot which still managed to hit the
> WARN_ONCE() in set_precision() by adding a crafted "dns_resolver" key:
>
> precision 50001 too large
> WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 864 at lib/vsprintf.c:2164 vsnprintf+0x48a/0x5a0
>
> The bug this time isn't just a printing bug, but also a logical error
> when multiple options ("#"-separated strings) are given in the key
> payload. Specifically, when separating an option string into name and
> value, if there is no value then the name is incorrectly considered to
> end at the end of the key payload, rather than the end of the current
> option. This bypasses validation of the option length, and also means
> that specifying multiple options is broken -- which presumably has gone
> unnoticed as there is currently only one valid option anyway.
>
> Fix it by correctly calculating the length of the option name.
>
> Reproducer:
>
> perl -e 'print "#A#", "\x00" x 50000' | keyctl padd dns_resolver desc @s
>
> Fixes: 4a2d789267e0 ("DNS: If the DNS server returns an error, allow that to be cached [ver #2]")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> ---
> net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c b/net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c
> index 40c851693f77e..d448823d4d2ed 100644
> --- a/net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c
> +++ b/net/dns_resolver/dns_key.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ dns_resolver_preparse(struct key_preparsed_payload *prep)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - eq = memchr(opt, '=', opt_len) ?: end;
> + eq = memchr(opt, '=', opt_len) ?: next_opt;
> opt_nlen = eq - opt;
> eq++;
It seems risky to advance eq++ in the case there the value is empty.
Its not not pointing to the value but it may be accessed twice further on
in this loop.
> opt_vlen = next_opt - eq; /* will be -1 if no value */
> --
> 2.18.0.rc1.242.g61856ae69a-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists