[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c486bcbac7302616f1bd651b4d2baad@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:51:37 -0600
From: Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next] ip-xfrm: Add support for OUTPUT_MARK
> Have you considered putting this earlier up in the output, where the
> mark is printed as well?
>
>> + if (tb[XFRMA_OUTPUT_MARK]) {
>> + __u32 output_mark =
>> rta_getattr_u32(tb[XFRMA_OUTPUT_MARK]);
>> +
>> + fprintf(fp, "\toutput-mark 0x%x %s", output_mark,
>> _SL_);
>> + }
>> }
>
> If you wanted to implement the suggestion above, I think you could do
> that by moving this code into xfrm_xfrma_print.
>
Hi Lorenzo
I have updated it now in v2.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists