[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27ef5cf260a14606df099ff112a7ab1b36b02395.camel@wdc.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 20:06:18 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>
To: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kent.overstreet@...il.com" <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
"linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com" <qla2xxx-upstream@...gic.com>,
"target-devel@...r.kernel.org" <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use sbitmap instead of percpu_ida
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 12:05 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> Removing the percpu_ida code nets over 400 lines of removal. It's not
> as spectacular as deleting an entire architecture, but it's still a
> worthy reduction in lines of code.
>
> Untested due to lack of hardware and not understanding how to set up a
> target platform.
>
> Changes from v1:
> - Fixed bugs pointed out by Jens in iscsit_wait_for_tag()
> - Abstracted out tag freeing as requested by Bart
> - Made iscsit_wait_for_tag static as pointed out by 0day
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists