netdev - Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Move inline xprt_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <675726D3-9273-4051-B38F-6377B8445A27@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jun 2018 13:19:07 -0400
From:   Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Move inline xprt_alloc_xid() up to fix compiler
 warning



> On Jun 13, 2018, at 8:01 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> 
> With gcc 4.1.2:
> 
>    net/sunrpc/xprt.c:69: warning: ‘xprt_alloc_xid’ declared inline after being called
>    net/sunrpc/xprt.c:69: warning: previous declaration of ‘xprt_alloc_xid’ was here
> 
> To fix this, move the function up, before its caller, and remove the no
> longer needed forward declaration.
> 
> Fixes: 37ac86c3a76c1136 ("SUNRPC: Initialize rpc_rqst outside of xprt->reserve_lock")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> ---
> net/sunrpc/xprt.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> index 3c85af058227d14b..60a8b9f91cf94b54 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@
>  * Local functions
>  */
> static void	 xprt_init(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct net *net);
> -static __be32	xprt_alloc_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
> static void	xprt_connect_status(struct rpc_task *task);
> static int      __xprt_get_cong(struct rpc_xprt *, struct rpc_task *);
> static void     __xprt_put_cong(struct rpc_xprt *, struct rpc_rqst *);
> @@ -956,6 +955,11 @@ static void xprt_timer(struct rpc_task *task)
> 		task->tk_status = 0;
> }
> 
> +static inline __be32 xprt_alloc_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> +{
> +	return (__force __be32)xprt->xid++;
> +}
> +
> /**
>  * xprt_prepare_transmit - reserve the transport before sending a request
>  * @task: RPC task about to send a request
> @@ -1296,11 +1300,6 @@ void xprt_retry_reserve(struct rpc_task *task)
> 	xprt->ops->alloc_slot(xprt, task);
> }
> 
> -static inline __be32 xprt_alloc_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> -{
> -	return (__force __be32)xprt->xid++;
> -}
> -

For code organization, we might want to keep xprt_alloc_xid
together with xprt_init_xid. Would it be better to simply
remove the "inline" directive from these two and let the
compiler choose the best optimization?


> static inline void xprt_init_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> {
> 	xprt->xid = prandom_u32();
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Chuck Lever