netdev - Re: [bpf PATCH 4/6] bpf: sockmap, tcp_disconnect to listen transition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180614005601.bsjijlsr7smpngde@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:56:01 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bpf PATCH 4/6] bpf: sockmap, tcp_disconnect to listen transition

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 10:50:14AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> After adding checks to ensure TCP is in ESTABLISHED state when a
> sock is added we need to also ensure that user does not transition
> through tcp_disconnect() and back into ESTABLISHED state without
> sockmap removing the sock.
> 
> To do this add unhash hook and remove sock from map there.
In bpf_tcp_init():
        sk->sk_prot = &tcp_bpf_proto;

I may have missed a lock while reading sockmap.c.
Is it possible that tcp_disconnect() is being called while
the above assignment is also being done (e.g. through BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM)?
The same situation go for the ESTABLISHED check.

> 
> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Fixes: 81110384441a ("bpf: sockmap, add hash map support")
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/sockmap.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> index 2e848cd..91c7b47 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/sockmap.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct smap_psock {
>  
>  	struct proto *sk_proto;
>  	void (*save_close)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> +	void (*save_unhash)(struct sock *sk);
>  	void (*save_data_ready)(struct sock *sk);
>  	void (*save_write_space)(struct sock *sk);
>  };
> @@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ static int bpf_tcp_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>  static int bpf_tcp_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
>  			    int offset, size_t size, int flags);
>  static void bpf_tcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> +static void bpf_tcp_unhash(struct sock *sk);
>  
>  static inline struct smap_psock *smap_psock_sk(const struct sock *sk)
>  {
> @@ -182,6 +184,7 @@ static void build_protos(struct proto prot[SOCKMAP_NUM_CONFIGS],
>  {
>  	prot[SOCKMAP_BASE]			= *base;
>  	prot[SOCKMAP_BASE].close		= bpf_tcp_close;
> +	prot[SOCKMAP_BASE].unhash		= bpf_tcp_unhash;
>  	prot[SOCKMAP_BASE].recvmsg		= bpf_tcp_recvmsg;
>  	prot[SOCKMAP_BASE].stream_memory_read	= bpf_tcp_stream_read;
>  
> @@ -215,6 +218,7 @@ static int bpf_tcp_init(struct sock *sk)
>  	}
>  
>  	psock->save_close = sk->sk_prot->close;
> +	psock->save_unhash = sk->sk_prot->unhash;
>  	psock->sk_proto = sk->sk_prot;
>  
>  	/* Build IPv6 sockmap whenever the address of tcpv6_prot changes */
> @@ -302,28 +306,12 @@ struct smap_psock_map_entry *psock_map_pop(struct sock *sk,
>  	return e;
>  }
>  
> -static void bpf_tcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> +static void bpf_tcp_remove(struct sock *sk, struct smap_psock *psock)
>  {
> -	void (*close_fun)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
>  	struct smap_psock_map_entry *e;
>  	struct sk_msg_buff *md, *mtmp;
> -	struct smap_psock *psock;
>  	struct sock *osk;
>  
> -	rcu_read_lock();
> -	psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
> -	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
> -		rcu_read_unlock();
> -		return sk->sk_prot->close(sk, timeout);
> -	}
> -
> -	/* The psock may be destroyed anytime after exiting the RCU critial
> -	 * section so by the time we use close_fun the psock may no longer
> -	 * be valid. However, bpf_tcp_close is called with the sock lock
> -	 * held so the close hook and sk are still valid.
> -	 */
> -	close_fun = psock->save_close;
> -
>  	if (psock->cork) {
>  		free_start_sg(psock->sock, psock->cork);
>  		kfree(psock->cork);
> @@ -378,6 +366,51 @@ static void bpf_tcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
>  		}
>  		e = psock_map_pop(sk, psock);
>  	}
> +}
> +
> +static void bpf_tcp_unhash(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> +	void (*unhash_fun)(struct sock *sk);
> +	struct smap_psock *psock;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
> +	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		return sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The psock may be destroyed anytime after exiting the RCU critial
> +	 * section so by the time we use close_fun the psock may no longer
> +	 * be valid. However, bpf_tcp_close is called with the sock lock
> +	 * held so the close hook and sk are still valid.
> +	 */
> +	unhash_fun = psock->save_unhash;
> +	bpf_tcp_remove(sk, psock);
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	unhash_fun(sk);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void bpf_tcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> +{
> +	void (*close_fun)(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> +	struct smap_psock *psock;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	psock = smap_psock_sk(sk);
> +	if (unlikely(!psock)) {
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		return sk->sk_prot->close(sk, timeout);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The psock may be destroyed anytime after exiting the RCU critial
> +	 * section so by the time we use close_fun the psock may no longer
> +	 * be valid. However, bpf_tcp_close is called with the sock lock
> +	 * held so the close hook and sk are still valid.
> +	 */
> +	close_fun = psock->save_close;
> +	bpf_tcp_remove(sk, psock);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	close_fun(sk, timeout);
>  }
>