[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180614114945.GC6733@hmswarspite.think-freely.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 07:49:45 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Michael Tuexen <tuexen@...muenster.de>, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next] sctp: add support for SCTP_REUSE_PORT sockopt
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:44:48AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> This feature is actually already supported by sk->sk_reuse which can be
> set by socket level opt SO_REUSEADDR. But it's not working exactly as
> RFC6458 demands in section 8.1.27, like:
>
> - This option only supports one-to-one style SCTP sockets
> - This socket option must not be used after calling bind()
> or sctp_bindx().
>
> Besides, SCTP_REUSE_PORT sockopt should be provided for user's programs.
> Otherwise, the programs with SCTP_REUSE_PORT from other systems will not
> work in linux.
>
> To separate it from the socket level version, this patch adds 'reuse' in
> sctp_sock and it works pretty much as sk->sk_reuse, but with some extra
> setup limitations that are needed when it is being enabled.
>
> "It should be noted that the behavior of the socket-level socket option
> to reuse ports and/or addresses for SCTP sockets is unspecified", so it
> leaves SO_REUSEADDR as is for the compatibility.
>
> Note that the name SCTP_REUSE_PORT is kind of confusing, it is identical
> to SO_REUSEADDR with some extra restriction, so here it uses 'reuse' in
> sctp_sock instead of 'reuseport'. As for sk->sk_reuseport support for
> SCTP, it will be added in another patch.
>
> Thanks to Neil to make this clear.
>
> v1->v2:
> - add sctp_sk->reuse to separate it from the socket level version.
>
Thanks Xin, Assuming some documentation for man sctp(7) is in the works
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists