[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1529065762.27158.40.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:29:22 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>,
Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <kevin@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>,
chas@....nrl.navy.mil, Mathias Kresin <dev@...sin.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/17] net: convert sock.sk_wmem_alloc from atomic_t to
refcount_t
On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 13:08 +0300, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/atmdev.h b/include/linux/atmdev.h
> index c1da539..4d97a89 100644
> --- a/include/linux/atmdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/atmdev.h
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static inline void atm_return(struct atm_vcc *vcc,int truesize)
>
> static inline int atm_may_send(struct atm_vcc *vcc,unsigned int size)
> {
> - return (size + atomic_read(&sk_atm(vcc)->sk_wmem_alloc)) <
> + return (size + refcount_read(&sk_atm(vcc)->sk_wmem_alloc)) <
> sk_atm(vcc)->sk_sndbuf;
> }
Hm, this (commit 14afee4b6092fd) may have broken PPPoATM. I did spend a
while staring hard at my own commit 9d02daf754238 which introduced
pppoatm_may_send(), but it's actually atm_may_send() which is never
allowing packets to be pushed.
Debugging (which is ongoing) has so far shown that we are accounting
for a packet in pppoatm_send() which has skb->truesize==0x1c0, and
later end up in pppoatm_pop()→atm_raw_pop() with skb->truesize==0x2c0.
This was always harmless before, but now it's a refcount_t it appears
to underflow and go into its "screw you" mode and never let any more
packets get sent.
I'm staring hard at the special case in pskb_expand_head() to *not*
change skb->truesize under certain circumstances, and wondering if that
(is, should be) covering the case of ATM skbs:
/* It is not generally safe to change skb->truesize.
* For the moment, we really care of rx path, or
* when skb is orphaned (not attached to a socket).
*/
if (!skb->sk || skb->destructor == sock_edemux)
skb->truesize += size - osize;
Failing that, maybe we should copy the accounted value of skb->truesize
into the struct skb_atm_data in skb->cb at the time we add it to
sk_wmem_alloc — and then subtract *that* value from sk_wmem_alloc in
atm_raw_pop() instead of the then current value of skb->truesize.
Suggestions?
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5213 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists