[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180618220504.GH6805@ziepe.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 16:05:04 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 00/20] Introduce mlx5 DEVX interface
On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:59:46PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> Leon Romanovsky (2):
> drm/i915: Move u64-to-ptr helpers to general header
> kernel.h: Reuse u64_to_ptr macro to cast __user pointers
I dropped these since they are not needed by this series when using a
union.
> Matan Barak (5):
> IB/uverbs: Export uverbs idr and fd types
> IB/uverbs: Add PTR_IN attributes that are allocated/copied
> automatically
Revised this one, as noted
> IB/uverbs: Add a macro to define a type with no kernel known size
> IB/uverbs: Allow an empty namespace in ioctl() framework
> IB/uverbs: Refactor uverbs_finalize_objects
I put the above in a branch and can apply them if you ack my revisions..
> net/mlx5_core: Prevent warns in dmesg upon firmware commands
> IB/core: Improve uverbs_cleanup_ucontext algorithm
I dropped these two (they are linked), need comments addressed and
resent.
> Yishai Hadas (13):
> net/mlx5: Expose DEVX ifc structures
> IB/mlx5: Introduce DEVX
> IB/core: Introduce DECLARE_UVERBS_GLOBAL_METHODS
> IB: Expose ib_ucontext from a given ib_uverbs_file
> IB/mlx5: Add support for DEVX general command
> IB/mlx5: Add obj create and destroy functionality
> IB/mlx5: Add DEVX support for modify and query commands
> IB/mlx5: Add support for DEVX query UAR
> IB/mlx5: Add DEVX support for memory registration
> IB/mlx5: Add DEVX query EQN support
> IB/mlx5: Expose DEVX tree
I put these in a branch also and can apply them, but I need the first
two patches in the mlx5 core branch first please, thanks.
Since this requires so many core patches I think I prefer to merge the
mlx core branch then apply rather merge a branch.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists