[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85602eg0ja.fsf@mojatatu.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:15:53 -0400
From: Roman Mashak <mrv@...atatu.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...atatu.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 5/5] net sched actions: fix misleading text strings in pedit action
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> writes:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:56:08 -0400
[...]
>> @@ -326,12 +326,12 @@ static int tcf_pedit(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *a,
>> }
>>
>> if (offset % 4) {
>> - pr_info("tc filter pedit offset must be on 32 bit boundaries\n");
>> + pr_info("tc action pedit offset must be on 32 bit boundaries\n");
>> goto bad;
>> }
>>
>> if (!offset_valid(skb, hoffset + offset)) {
>> - pr_info("tc filter pedit offset %d out of bounds\n",
>> + pr_info("tc action pedit offset %d out of bounds\n",
>> hoffset + offset);
>> goto bad;
>
> Time to convert these to netlink extack reporting?
Yes, this is planned in next patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists