netdev - [PATCH net] enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 19 Jun 2018 08:15:24 -0700
From:   Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@...co.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, benve@...co.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@...co.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe

lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without
initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops
can be called when interface is down.

Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe.

INFO: trying to register non-static key.
the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
turning off the locking correctness validator.
CPU: 18 PID: 1189 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-devel+ #27
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x85/0xc0
register_lock_class+0x550/0x560
? __handle_mm_fault+0xa8b/0x1100
__lock_acquire+0x81/0x670
lock_acquire+0xb9/0x1e0
?  enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
_raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x80
? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic]
ethtool_get_rxnfc+0x8d/0x1c0
dev_ethtool+0x16c8/0x2400
? __mutex_lock+0x64d/0xa00
? dev_load+0x6a/0x150
dev_ioctl+0x253/0x4b0
sock_do_ioctl+0x9a/0x130
sock_ioctl+0x1af/0x350
do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x670
? syscall_trace_enter+0x1e2/0x380
ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x170
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@...co.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c | 3 +--
 drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c
index 973c1fb70d09..99038dfc7fbe 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_clsf.c
@@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(struct enic *enic)
 	enic->rfs_h.max = enic->config.num_arfs;
 	enic->rfs_h.free = enic->rfs_h.max;
 	enic->rfs_h.toclean = 0;
-	enic_rfs_timer_start(enic);
 }

 void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)
@@ -88,7 +87,6 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)

 	enic_rfs_timer_stop(enic);
 	spin_lock_bh(&enic->rfs_h.lock);
-	enic->rfs_h.free = 0;
 	for (i = 0; i < (1 << ENIC_RFS_FLW_BITSHIFT); i++) {
 		struct hlist_head *hhead;
 		struct hlist_node *tmp;
@@ -99,6 +97,7 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)
 			enic_delfltr(enic, n->fltr_id);
 			hlist_del(&n->node);
 			kfree(n);
+			enic->rfs_h.free++;
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock_bh(&enic->rfs_h.lock);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
index 30d2eaa18c04..e6ad581eadd8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c
@@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static int enic_open(struct net_device *netdev)
 		vnic_intr_unmask(&enic->intr[i]);

 	enic_notify_timer_start(enic);
-	enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(enic);
+	enic_rfs_timer_start(enic);

 	return 0;

@@ -2904,6 +2904,7 @@ static int enic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)

 	timer_setup(&enic->notify_timer, enic_notify_timer, 0);

+	enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(enic);
 	enic_set_rx_coal_setting(enic);
 	INIT_WORK(&enic->reset, enic_reset);
 	INIT_WORK(&enic->tx_hang_reset, enic_tx_hang_reset);
-- 
2.17.1