lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180620175128.GA27235@apalos>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:51:28 +0300
From:   Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To:     Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        grygorii.strashko@...com, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org,
        nsekhar@...com, jiri@...nulli.us, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        francois.ozog@...aro.org, yogeshs@...com, spatton@...com,
        Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2, net-next, PATCH 4/4] net/cpsw_switchdev: add switchdev
 mode of operation on cpsw driver

Hello Ivan,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 02:56:48PM +0200, Ivan Vecera wrote:
> On 18.6.2018 22:19, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Jiri proposed using devlink, which makes sense, but i am not sure it's
> > applicable on this patchset. This will change the driver completely and will
> > totally break backwards compatibility.
> 
> Another good reason for a new driver.
> 
> I.
This is actually conflicting at least to my understanding. Jiri proposed using 
devlink was used as an alternative method to enable a new mode instead of 
adding it on a .config option. A new driver wouldn't have a need for that right?

Thanks
Ilias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ