[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180621145935.41ff8974@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 14:59:35 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Okash Khawaja <osk@...com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: btf: add btf json print functionality
On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:30:53 -0700, Okash Khawaja wrote:
> $ sudo bpftool map dump -p id 14
> [{
> "key": 0
> },{
> "value": {
> "m": 1,
> "n": 2,
> "o": "c",
> "p": [15,16,17,18,15,16,17,18
> ],
> "q": [[25,26,27,28,25,26,27,28
> ],[35,36,37,38,35,36,37,38
> ],[45,46,47,48,45,46,47,48
> ],[55,56,57,58,55,56,57,58
> ]
> ],
> "r": 1,
> "s": 0x7ffff6f70568,
> "t": {
> "x": 5,
> "y": 10
> },
> "u": 100,
> "v": 20,
> "w1": 0x7,
> "w2": 0x3
> }
> }
> ]
I don't think this format is okay, JSON output is an API you shouldn't
break. You can change the non-JSON output whatever way you like, but
JSON must remain backwards compatible.
The dump today has object per entry, e.g.:
{
"key":["0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00",
],
"value": ["0x02","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00"
]
}
This format must remain, you may only augment it with new fields. E.g.:
{
"key":["0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00",
],
"key_struct":{
"index":0
},
"value": ["0x02","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00","0x00"
],
"value_struct":{
"src_ip":2,
"dst_ip:0
}
}
The name XYZ_struct may not be the best, perhaps you can come up with a
better one?
Does that make sense? Am I missing what you're doing here?
One process note - please make sure you run checkpatch.pl --strict on
bpftool patches before posting.
Thanks for working on this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists