[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180622053141-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 05:32:28 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Siwei Liu <loseweigh@...il.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, aaron.f.brown@...el.com,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@...cle.com>,
vijay.balakrishna@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce
VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 06:21:55PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 7:59 AM, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:48:58 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 06:06:19PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >> > In any case, I'm not sure anymore why we'd want the extra uuid.
> >>
> >> It's mostly so we can have e.g. multiple devices with same MAC
> >> (which some people seem to want in order to then use
> >> then with different containers).
> >>
> >> But it is also handy for when you assign a PF, since then you
> >> can't set the MAC.
> >>
> >
> > OK, so what about the following:
> >
> > - introduce a new feature bit, VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY_UUID that indicates
> > that we have a new uuid field in the virtio-net config space
> > - in QEMU, add a property for virtio-net that allows to specify a uuid,
> > offer VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY_UUID if set
> > - when configuring, set the property to the group UUID of the vfio-pci
> > device
>
> If feature negotiation fails on VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY_UUID, is it safe
> to still expose UUID in the config space on virtio-pci?
Yes but guest is not supposed to read it.
> I'm not even sure if it's sane to expose group UUID on the PCI bridge
> where the corresponding vfio-pci device attached to for a guest which
> doesn't support the feature (legacy).
>
> -Siwei
Yes but you won't add the primary behind such a bridge.
>
> > - in the guest, use the uuid from the virtio-net device's config space
> > if applicable; else, fall back to matching by MAC as done today
> >
> > That should work for all virtio transports.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists