[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180622.134913.2049651808540037401.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:49:13 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shannon.nelson@...cle.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, anders.roxell@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] fixes for ipsec selftests
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:42:41 -0700
> A couple of bad behaviors in the ipsec selftest were pointed out
> by Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org> and are addressed here.
>
> Shannon Nelson (2):
> selftests: rtnetlink: hide complaint from terminated monitor
> selftests: rtnetlink: use a local IP address for IPsec tests
Series applied, but I wonder about patch #2.
The idea is that we don't make modifications to the actual system
networking configuration and therefore make changes that can't
possibly disrupt connectivity for the system under test.
Using a configured local IP address seems to subvert that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists