[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180624082353.16138-3-leon@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 11:23:43 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>,
Noa Osherovich <noaos@...lanox.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...lanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
linux-netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 02/12] RDMA/uverbs: Check existence of create_flow callback
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
In the accepted series "Refactor ib_uverbs_write path", we presented the
roadmap to get rid of uverbs_cmd_mask and uverbs_ex_cmd_mask fields in
favor of simple check of function pointer. So let's put NULL check of
create_flow function callback despite the fact that uverbs_ex_cmd_mask
still exists.
Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg60753.html
Suggested-by: Michael J Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
index c842a9423fbf..6251d80db732 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
@@ -3565,6 +3565,11 @@ int ib_uverbs_ex_create_flow(struct ib_uverbs_file *file,
goto err_put;
}
+ if (!qp->device->create_flow) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto err_put;
+ }
+
flow_attr = kzalloc(struct_size(flow_attr, flows,
cmd.flow_attr.num_of_specs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!flow_attr) {
--
2.14.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists