[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180625020623.GJ3006@eros>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 12:06:23 +1000
From: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
To: "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] docs: e100[0] fix build errors
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 01:11:33AM +0000, Kirsher, Jeffrey T wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 24, 2018, at 16:41, Tobin C. Harding <me@...in.cc> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 01:22:37PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Hi Tobin,
> >>
> >>> On 06/21/2018 05:37 PM, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> >>> Hi Jonathan,
> >>>
> >>> This patch set fixes current docs build failure on Linus' mainline
> >>>
> >>> commit: (ba4dbdedd3ed Merge tag 'jfs-4.18' of git://github.com/kleikamp/linux-shaggy)
> >>>
> >>> (FYI this is 8 commits after Linux 4.18-rc1).
> >>>
> >>> And also same build errors on today's linux-next
> >>>
> >>> 8439c34f07a3 (tag: next-20180621, linux-next/master, linux-next) Add linux-next specific files for 20180621
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I split the patches in between the two drivers to enable use of the
> >>> 'Fixes:' tag.
> >>>
> >>> Tobin C. Harding (4):
> >>> Documentation: e100: Use correct heading adornment
> >>> Documentation: e1000: Use correct heading adornment
> >>> Documentation: e100: Fix docs build error
> >>> Documentation: e1000: Fix docs build error
> >>>
> >>> Documentation/networking/e100.rst | 112 +++++++++++++++--------------
> >>> Documentation/networking/e1000.rst | 76 ++++++++++----------
> >>> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> I am still seeing a few warnings (your 4 patches applied to
> >> linux-next-20180622):
> >>
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:57: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:68: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:75: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:84: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e100.rst:93: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:83: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:84: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:173: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> >> linux-next-20180622/Documentation/networking/e1000.rst:236: WARNING: Definition list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> >>
> >>
> >> You didn't get these warnings? or they weren't important?
> >> or "perfect" was not your primary goal? :) [which is fine]
> >>
> >> [I see around 50 similar doc formatting warnings/errors in the entire
> >> Documentation build.]
> >
> > Thanks for testing this Randy. You are right there are a bunch of
> > warnings, I did not think to grep for warnings on these files - sloppy
> > work by me. The series has been applied already but I'll add clearing
> > these warnings to my TODO list.
>
> Thanks, already on it. I have a set of patches that I will push once Dave open’s up his net-next tree.
Oh cool, even better.
thanks,
Tobin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists